Quote Originally Posted by Biggin View Post
Patterson has a great chance at being NPOY. He will put up 20 points and 10 boards.
Chism is able to shoot the three somewhat, but he is nowhere near as capable down low as Patterson.
I thought it was general knowledge that Patterson is the best big in the SEC.
Chism isnt even the 2nd best big in the SEC, Vernardo is.

If Pearl's so much better, then why isnt he making the final four and playing for national titles?

And how in the world is going 1-1 against someone dominating them? That makes no sense at all.

If he can dominate a team that played for a national title, then why is his team losing to Oklahoma State in the first round?
I'd take Vernardo over Chism or Patterson. He's a freak.

Pearl has 1 NT in D2. He's not going to win a national title at UT, never will not going to happen, no matter who's there.

Pearl's 2-1. I actually thought they'd played more. Which is why I thought he'd dominated him more. I knew the last one was the only one Cal had won. I thought they'd played 2 times in 06-07. I was thinking it was 4-1.

06 UT 76 Memphis 58
07 UT 66 Memphis 62
08 Memphis 54 UT 52

Considering the players that Memphis has vs those of UT, it should never even be a game. Yet, Pearl's least talented team beat a loaded Memphis team by almost 20, beat the team that played for the NC, and Pearls worst team lost by 2 last year.